Arrowhead Course at Natanis Golf Course vs Tomahawk Course at Natanis Golf Course
Next to each other · numbers from each course's map geometry
Arrowhead Course at Natanis Golf Course
near Augusta, Maine
Tomahawk Course at Natanis Golf Course
near Augusta, Maine
| Measure | Arrowhead Course at Natanis Golf Course | Tomahawk Course at Natanis Golf Course |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 18 |
| Par | 72 | 72 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 4 · 10 · 4 | 4 · 10 · 4 |
| Measured length | 6,111 yd | 6,595 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 15, 516 yd | No. 15, 565 yd |
| Bunkers | 18 | 31 |
| Sand | 0.3 acres | 0.5 acres |
| Holes with water | 6 | 6 |
| Water on the property | 7.4 acres | 7.4 acres |
| Total climb | 238 ft | 243 ft |
| Elevation | 133–237 ft | 133–237 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -49 ft | -50 ft |
| Average green | 5,474 sq ft | 4,780 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 35 yd | 35 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,589 yd | 1,426 yd |
| Property | 355 acres | 355 acres |
| Cart path | 6.5 mi | 6.5 mi |
| Driving range | not mapped | not mapped |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Arrowhead Course at Natanis Golf Course | Tomahawk Course at Natanis Golf Course | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 5 | 478 | -24 | 5 | 515 | -11 |
| 2 | 4 | 378 | +12 | 4 | 392 | -11 |
| 3 | 4 | 324 | +15 | 5 | 519 | +14 |
| 4 | 5 | 424 | -26 | 3 | 155 | +2 |
| 5 | 3 | 199 | -15 | 4 | 403 | -18 |
| 6 | 4 | 245 | -45 | 4 | 387 | +21 |
| 7 | 3 | 190 | +34 | 3 | 152 | -8 |
| 8 | 4 | 355 | +22 | 4 | 366 | +3 |
| 9 | 4 | 235 | +6 | 4 | 413 | -18 |
| 10 | 3 | 177 | +14 | 3 | 152 | +4 |
| 11 | 4 | 355 | +7 | 4 | 393 | -10 |
| 12 | 3 | 144 | -41 | 4 | 429 | +13 |
| 13 | 4 | 393 | -13 | 3 | 201 | +7 |
| 14 | 4 | 415 | +14 | 5 | 504 | -27 |
| 15 | 5 | 516 | -27 | 5 | 565 | +26 |
| 16 | 4 | 439 | +11 | 4 | 310 | +18 |
| 17 | 5 | 453 | +22 | 4 | 357 | +30 |
| 18 | 4 | 391 | -49 | 4 | 382 | -50 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.