Atkinson Resort & Country Club, course 1 of 2 vs Atkinson Resort & Country Club, course 2 of 2
Next to each other · numbers from each course's map geometry
Atkinson Resort & Country Club, course 1 of 2
near Manchester, New Hampshire
Atkinson Resort & Country Club, course 2 of 2
near Manchester, New Hampshire
| Measure | Atkinson Resort & Country Club, course 1 of 2 | Atkinson Resort & Country Club, course 2 of 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 9 |
| Par | 63 | 36 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 11 · 5 · 2 | 2 · 5 · 2 |
| Measured length | 3,937 yd | 3,415 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 16, 491 yd | No. 2, 508 yd |
| Bunkers | 38 | 29 |
| Sand | 1.5 acres | 1.4 acres |
| Holes with water | 10 | 5 |
| Water on the property | 8.1 acres | 8.1 acres |
| Total climb | 207 ft | 119 ft |
| Elevation | 136–339 ft | 136–339 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -39 ft | -49 ft |
| Average green | 4,271 sq ft | 5,325 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 29 yd | 36 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 2,677 yd | 813 yd |
| Property | 321 acres | 321 acres |
| Cart path | 7.9 mi | 7.9 mi |
| Driving range | yes | yes |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Atkinson Resort & Country Club, course 1 of 2 | Atkinson Resort & Country Club, course 2 of 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 3 | 95 | -8 | 4 | 358 | -10 |
| 2 | 3 | 102 | -8 | 5 | 508 | -49 |
| 3 | 3 | 130 | -25 | 3 | 211 | +9 |
| 4 | 3 | 56 | -12 | 4 | 402 | +23 |
| 5 | 3 | 117 | +4 | 4 | 417 | -16 |
| 6 | 3 | 76 | -6 | 5 | 501 | -24 |
| 7 | 3 | 95 | +7 | 4 | 415 | +11 |
| 8 | 3 | 88 | +16 | 3 | 204 | +7 |
| 9 | 3 | 90 | +11 | 4 | 399 | +41 |
| 10 | 4 | 369 | -39 | – | – | – |
| 11 | 3 | 185 | -30 | – | – | – |
| 12 | 5 | 382 | -10 | – | – | – |
| 13 | 4 | 331 | -7 | – | – | – |
| 14 | 3 | 155 | -11 | – | – | – |
| 15 | 4 | 422 | +30 | – | – | – |
| 16 | 5 | 491 | +7 | – | – | – |
| 17 | 4 | 411 | 0 | – | – | – |
| 18 | 4 | 342 | +30 | – | – | – |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.