Belmont Country Club vs Sherwood Forest Golf Club
10 mi apart · numbers from each course's map geometry
Belmont Country Club
near Fresno, California
Sherwood Forest Golf Club
near Reedley, California
| Measure | Belmont Country Club | Sherwood Forest Golf Club |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 18 |
| Par | 72 | – |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 4 · 10 · 4 | 0 · 0 · 0 |
| Measured length | 6,570 yd | 5,696 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 12, 537 yd | No. 6, 518 yd |
| Bunkers | 52 | 0 |
| Sand | 1.7 acres | – |
| Holes with water | 8 | 0 |
| Water on the property | 0.9 acres | – |
| Total climb | 48 ft | 45 ft |
| Elevation | 345–356 ft | 402–421 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -4 ft | -6 ft |
| Average green | 3,431 sq ft | 4,434 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 33 yd | – |
| Green to next tee, total | 982 yd | 1,253 yd |
| Property | 111 acres | 102 acres |
| Cart path | 1.7 mi | – |
| Driving range | not mapped | yes |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Belmont Country Club | Sherwood Forest Golf Club | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 4 | 373 | -4 | – | 311 | +3 |
| 2 | 3 | 121 | +1 | – | 334 | +3 |
| 3 | 4 | 453 | 0 | – | 303 | -3 |
| 4 | 4 | 409 | +7 | – | 135 | 0 |
| 5 | 5 | 515 | +1 | – | 342 | +4 |
| 6 | 4 | 375 | -2 | – | 518 | -3 |
| 7 | 4 | 346 | -2 | – | 380 | -6 |
| 8 | 3 | 206 | -1 | – | 298 | -2 |
| 9 | 5 | 473 | +8 | – | 337 | +4 |
| 10 | 4 | 442 | -4 | – | 296 | -3 |
| 11 | 3 | 173 | +4 | – | 447 | +5 |
| 12 | 5 | 537 | +5 | – | 426 | +6 |
| 13 | 3 | 185 | +1 | – | 174 | +4 |
| 14 | 4 | 378 | 0 | – | 493 | -5 |
| 15 | 4 | 324 | -1 | – | 111 | +4 |
| 16 | 4 | 410 | -4 | – | 355 | -5 |
| 17 | 4 | 319 | +5 | – | 158 | -2 |
| 18 | 5 | 531 | +4 | – | 278 | 0 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.