Benson Park Golf Course vs Steve Hogan Golf Course
3.6 mi apart · numbers from each course's map geometry
Benson Park Golf Course
Omaha, Nebraska
Steve Hogan Golf Course
Omaha, Nebraska
| Measure | Benson Park Golf Course | Steve Hogan Golf Course |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 9 |
| Par | 72 | – |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 4 · 10 · 4 | 0 · 0 · 0 |
| Measured length | 6,552 yd | 1,154 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 15, 525 yd | No. 2, 173 yd |
| Bunkers | 32 | 1 |
| Sand | 1.2 acres | – |
| Holes with water | 3 | 2 |
| Water on the property | 1.6 acres | 4.8 acres |
| Total climb | 260 ft | 22 ft |
| Elevation | 1,105–1,206 ft | 1,013–1,041 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -95 ft | -11 ft |
| Average green | 5,799 sq ft | 3,463 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 35 yd | 28 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 919 yd | 599 yd |
| Property | 144 acres | 34 acres |
| Driving range | not mapped | not mapped |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Benson Park Golf Course | Steve Hogan Golf Course | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 4 | 434 | -89 | – | 148 | -11 |
| 2 | 4 | 386 | -5 | – | 173 | +3 |
| 3 | 5 | 504 | -4 | – | 83 | +4 |
| 4 | 3 | 174 | -2 | – | 131 | 0 |
| 5 | 4 | 465 | +13 | – | 134 | +8 |
| 6 | 3 | 136 | +5 | – | 142 | -6 |
| 7 | 4 | 357 | +18 | – | 102 | -5 |
| 8 | 5 | 469 | -30 | – | 119 | -1 |
| 9 | 4 | 382 | +43 | – | 122 | -5 |
| 10 | 4 | 421 | -95 | – | – | – |
| 11 | 5 | 455 | 0 | – | – | – |
| 12 | 4 | 359 | +2 | – | – | – |
| 13 | 3 | 188 | -7 | – | – | – |
| 14 | 4 | 401 | +9 | – | – | – |
| 15 | 5 | 525 | 0 | – | – | – |
| 16 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 17 | 4 | 407 | -8 | – | – | – |
| 18 | 4 | 340 | +54 | – | – | – |
| 19 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 20 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 21 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 22 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 23 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 24 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 25 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 26 | 3 | 149 | -8 | – | – | – |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.