Bixby Village Golf Course vs El Dorado Park Golf Course
2.4 mi apart · numbers from each course's map geometry
Bixby Village Golf Course
Long Beach, California
El Dorado Park Golf Course
Long Beach, California
| Measure | Bixby Village Golf Course | El Dorado Park Golf Course |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 9 | 18 |
| Par | 30 | 72 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 6 · 3 · 0 | 4 · 10 · 4 |
| Measured length | 1,615 yd | 6,508 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 8, 330 yd | No. 10, 518 yd |
| Bunkers | 13 | 46 |
| Sand | 0.8 acres | 1.4 acres |
| Holes with water | 4 | 9 |
| Water on the property | 0.8 acres | 1.5 acres |
| Total climb | 28 ft | 76 ft |
| Elevation | 10–34 ft | 15–32 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -8 ft | -3 ft |
| Average green | 4,472 sq ft | 4,972 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 29 yd | 36 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 705 yd | 1,746 yd |
| Property | 30 acres | 155 acres |
| Cart path | 0.2 mi | – |
| Driving range | not mapped | not mapped |
| Access | – | Municipal |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Bixby Village Golf Course | El Dorado Park Golf Course | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 3 | 129 | -3 | 4 | 353 | -2 |
| 2 | 3 | 102 | +9 | 4 | 378 | +7 |
| 3 | 4 | 241 | -4 | 3 | 144 | -2 |
| 4 | 4 | 253 | -8 | 5 | 510 | -1 |
| 5 | 3 | 144 | -2 | 4 | 415 | -3 |
| 6 | 3 | 106 | 0 | 4 | 361 | +3 |
| 7 | 3 | 181 | +1 | 5 | 479 | -1 |
| 8 | 4 | 330 | +8 | 4 | 493 | -2 |
| 9 | 3 | 129 | -3 | 3 | 216 | -3 |
| 10 | – | – | – | 5 | 518 | +5 |
| 11 | – | – | – | 4 | 372 | 0 |
| 12 | – | – | – | 3 | 181 | +2 |
| 13 | – | – | – | 4 | 403 | -1 |
| 14 | – | – | – | 4 | 353 | +5 |
| 15 | – | – | – | 4 | 374 | -2 |
| 16 | – | – | – | 4 | 315 | +1 |
| 17 | – | – | – | 3 | 148 | -1 |
| 18 | – | – | – | 5 | 495 | 0 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.