cascade Course at Gold Mountain Golf Course vs McCormick Woods Golf Club
3.5 mi apart · numbers from each course's map geometry
cascade Course at Gold Mountain Golf Course
Bremerton, Washington
McCormick Woods Golf Club
Port Orchard, Washington
| Measure | cascade Course at Gold Mountain Golf Course | McCormick Woods Golf Club |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 18 |
| Par | – | 71 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 4 · 9 · 3 | 3 · 10 · 4 |
| Measured length | 6,466 yd | 6,555 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 15, 527 yd | No. 9, 524 yd |
| Bunkers | 27 | 25 |
| Sand | 1.5 acres | 0.8 acres |
| Holes with water | 4 | 4 |
| Water on the property | 1.4 acres | 1.9 acres |
| Total climb | 296 ft | 256 ft |
| Elevation | 215–424 ft | 341–467 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -48 ft | -59 ft |
| Average green | 5,008 sq ft | 4,526 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 34 yd | 31 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,567 yd | 2,319 yd |
| Property | 355 acres | 182 acres |
| Cart path | 10.3 mi | 6.1 mi |
| Driving range | not mapped | not mapped |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | cascade Course at Gold Mountain Golf Course | McCormick Woods Golf Club | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | – | 435 | +21 | 4 | 377 | +19 |
| 2 | – | 356 | +5 | 5 | 508 | +19 |
| 3 | 3 | 220 | -2 | 4 | 413 | -18 |
| 4 | 4 | 355 | -3 | 3 | 222 | -4 |
| 5 | 5 | 451 | -8 | 4 | 365 | -37 |
| 6 | 4 | 395 | -41 | 4 | 403 | -27 |
| 7 | 3 | 159 | -7 | 3 | 129 | +6 |
| 8 | 4 | 412 | +9 | 4 | 346 | -4 |
| 9 | 4 | 394 | -10 | 5 | 524 | -23 |
| 10 | 4 | 403 | +2 | 4 | 395 | +4 |
| 11 | 4 | 389 | +3 | 2 | 194 | -8 |
| 12 | 4 | 338 | +52 | 4 | 331 | -59 |
| 13 | 4 | 346 | -16 | 5 | 484 | -10 |
| 14 | 3 | 229 | -23 | 4 | 389 | +36 |
| 15 | 5 | 527 | -48 | 4 | 369 | +35 |
| 16 | 4 | 376 | -9 | 4 | 414 | -1 |
| 17 | 3 | 163 | -16 | 3 | 191 | -4 |
| 18 | 5 | 518 | +6 | 5 | 501 | -8 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.