Chantilly National Golf and Country Club vs Oaks Course at Twin Lakes Golf Course
4.4 mi apart · numbers from each course's map geometry
Chantilly National Golf and Country Club
near Manassas, Virginia
Oaks Course at Twin Lakes Golf Course
near Manassas, Virginia
| Measure | Chantilly National Golf and Country Club | Oaks Course at Twin Lakes Golf Course |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 18 |
| Par | 72 | 72 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 4 · 10 · 4 | 4 · 10 · 4 |
| Measured length | 6,906 yd | 6,658 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 17, 530 yd | No. 14, 583 yd |
| Bunkers | 63 | 56 |
| Sand | 2 acres | 1.3 acres |
| Holes with water | 2 | 5 |
| Water on the property | 14.5 acres | 17.8 acres |
| Total climb | 160 ft | 244 ft |
| Elevation | 219–270 ft | 293–393 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -14 ft | -50 ft |
| Average green | 5,423 sq ft | 6,305 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 29 yd | 33 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,634 yd | 1,588 yd |
| Property | 214 acres | 357 acres |
| Cart path | 5.1 mi | 11.2 mi |
| Driving range | not mapped | yes |
| Access | – | Municipal |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Chantilly National Golf and Country Club | Oaks Course at Twin Lakes Golf Course | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 4 | 404 | -8 | 5 | 541 | -50 |
| 2 | 4 | 339 | +4 | 4 | 471 | +1 |
| 3 | 5 | 527 | -12 | 4 | 338 | +11 |
| 4 | 3 | 199 | 0 | 4 | 375 | +12 |
| 5 | 4 | 424 | +2 | 3 | 182 | -10 |
| 6 | 5 | 498 | +13 | 4 | 324 | +8 |
| 7 | 3 | 171 | +2 | 4 | 400 | -18 |
| 8 | 4 | 434 | -10 | 3 | 195 | -14 |
| 9 | 4 | 414 | 0 | 4 | 359 | +10 |
| 10 | 4 | 429 | -14 | 4 | 443 | -9 |
| 11 | 4 | 442 | +1 | 4 | 318 | +17 |
| 12 | 3 | 189 | 0 | 3 | 159 | -8 |
| 13 | 5 | 523 | -10 | 5 | 445 | +1 |
| 14 | 3 | 193 | +2 | 5 | 583 | +19 |
| 15 | 4 | 372 | +15 | 3 | 236 | -4 |
| 16 | 4 | 414 | -7 | 4 | 430 | -10 |
| 17 | 5 | 530 | +3 | 4 | 326 | +17 |
| 18 | 4 | 404 | +2 | 5 | 533 | -22 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.