Chateau Course at Chateau Elan Golf Club vs Woodlands Course at Chateau Elan Golf Club
Next to each other · numbers from each course's map geometry
Chateau Course at Chateau Elan Golf Club
Braselton, Georgia
Woodlands Course at Chateau Elan Golf Club
Braselton, Georgia
| Measure | Chateau Course at Chateau Elan Golf Club | Woodlands Course at Chateau Elan Golf Club |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 18 |
| Par | 71 | 72 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 4 · 11 · 3 | 4 · 10 · 4 |
| Measured length | 6,802 yd | 6,651 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 9, 569 yd | No. 8, 572 yd |
| Bunkers | 61 | 48 |
| Sand | 1.5 acres | 0.9 acres |
| Holes with water | 10 | 4 |
| Water on the property | 13.7 acres | 13.7 acres |
| Total climb | 186 ft | 510 ft |
| Elevation | 817–1,003 ft | 817–1,003 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -47 ft | -104 ft |
| Average green | 6,284 sq ft | 5,714 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 41 yd | 34 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 2,002 yd | 2,353 yd |
| Property | 635 acres | 635 acres |
| Cart path | 16.8 mi | 16.8 mi |
| Driving range | yes | yes |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Chateau Course at Chateau Elan Golf Club | Woodlands Course at Chateau Elan Golf Club | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 4 | 379 | -38 | 5 | 552 | +41 |
| 2 | 4 | 396 | -47 | 3 | 190 | -30 |
| 3 | 5 | 521 | +4 | 4 | 384 | +40 |
| 4 | 4 | 413 | +9 | 4 | 399 | -104 |
| 5 | 4 | 440 | -27 | 4 | 337 | +25 |
| 6 | 3 | 156 | -19 | 3 | 215 | +18 |
| 7 | 4 | 421 | +5 | 4 | 422 | +61 |
| 8 | 3 | 194 | -8 | 5 | 572 | -77 |
| 9 | 5 | 569 | +15 | 4 | 382 | +28 |
| 10 | 4 | 397 | -10 | 5 | 451 | +50 |
| 11 | 4 | 369 | -3 | 4 | 402 | +26 |
| 12 | 3 | 193 | 0 | 4 | 387 | +5 |
| 13 | 4 | 396 | +19 | 3 | 190 | -18 |
| 14 | 4 | 423 | -32 | 4 | 427 | -50 |
| 15 | 5 | 532 | -46 | 5 | 487 | -49 |
| 16 | 3 | 176 | -21 | 4 | 333 | +41 |
| 17 | 4 | 370 | -2 | 3 | 136 | -19 |
| 18 | 4 | 457 | +11 | 4 | 385 | +8 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.