Cog Hill Golf & Country Club, course 2 of 4 vs Cog Hill Golf & Country Club, course 4 of 4
Next to each other · numbers from each course's map geometry
Cog Hill Golf & Country Club, course 2 of 4
Palos Park, Illinois
Cog Hill Golf & Country Club, course 4 of 4
Palos Park, Illinois
| Measure | Cog Hill Golf & Country Club, course 2 of 4 | Cog Hill Golf & Country Club, course 4 of 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 18 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 0 · 0 · 0 | 1 · 4 · 0 |
| Measured length | 6,671 yd | 6,055 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 3, 531 yd | No. 11, 586 yd |
| Bunkers | 20 | 29 |
| Sand | 0.7 acres | 0.9 acres |
| Holes with water | 5 | 6 |
| Water on the property | 14.8 acres | 14.8 acres |
| Total climb | 321 ft | 218 ft |
| Elevation | 609–734 ft | 609–734 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -43 ft | -24 ft |
| Average green | 7,108 sq ft | 6,128 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 32 yd | 30 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,524 yd | 1,254 yd |
| Property | 765 acres | 765 acres |
| Cart path | 23.9 mi | 23.9 mi |
| Driving range | not mapped | not mapped |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Cog Hill Golf & Country Club, course 2 of 4 | Cog Hill Golf & Country Club, course 4 of 4 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | – | 336 | -12 | – | 263 | +1 |
| 2 | – | 367 | +2 | – | 352 | -4 |
| 3 | – | 531 | -43 | – | 488 | -10 |
| 4 | – | 145 | -1 | – | 155 | -22 |
| 5 | – | 472 | +30 | – | 373 | +14 |
| 6 | – | 366 | 0 | – | 303 | +8 |
| 7 | – | 186 | +12 | – | 350 | -1 |
| 8 | – | 404 | +18 | – | 387 | 0 |
| 9 | – | 520 | +15 | – | 188 | 0 |
| 10 | – | 431 | -34 | – | 363 | +6 |
| 11 | – | 511 | +8 | – | 586 | -3 |
| 12 | – | 403 | -41 | – | 176 | -1 |
| 13 | – | 321 | -1 | – | 421 | -24 |
| 14 | – | 141 | -19 | 4 | 296 | +9 |
| 15 | – | 431 | +25 | 4 | 405 | +27 |
| 16 | – | 394 | +24 | 4 | 406 | +2 |
| 17 | – | 322 | -2 | 3 | 182 | -22 |
| 18 | – | 390 | +1 | 4 | 361 | +25 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.