Commons Course at Sand Valley Golf Resort vs Mammoth Dunes Course at Sand Valley Golf Resort
Next to each other · numbers from each course's map geometry
Commons Course at Sand Valley Golf Resort
near Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin
Mammoth Dunes Course at Sand Valley Golf Resort
near Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin
| Measure | Commons Course at Sand Valley Golf Resort | Mammoth Dunes Course at Sand Valley Golf Resort |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 12 | 18 |
| Par | 45 | 73 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 4 · 7 · 1 | 4 · 9 · 5 |
| Measured length | 3,237 yd | 7,265 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 1, 443 yd | No. 18, 583 yd |
| Bunkers | 16 | 110 |
| Sand | 0.5 acres | 105.6 acres |
| Holes with water | 2 | 0 |
| Water on the property | 16.4 acres | 16.4 acres |
| Total climb | 56 ft | 224 ft |
| Elevation | 980–1,064 ft | 980–1,064 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -11 ft | -49 ft |
| Average green | 11,166 sq ft | 10,732 sq ft |
| Green to next tee, total | 588 yd | 1,116 yd |
| Property | 1,301 acres | 1,301 acres |
| Cart path | 0.3 mi | 0.3 mi |
| Driving range | not mapped | not mapped |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Commons Course at Sand Valley Golf Resort | Mammoth Dunes Course at Sand Valley Golf Resort | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 5 | 443 | +7 | 4 | 424 | -16 |
| 2 | 3 | 153 | -11 | 4 | 423 | +20 |
| 3 | 4 | 316 | +6 | 5 | 529 | -7 |
| 4 | 4 | 369 | -4 | 3 | 201 | +14 |
| 5 | 3 | 106 | +2 | 4 | 461 | -49 |
| 6 | 4 | 300 | +6 | 4 | 356 | -5 |
| 7 | 4 | 302 | -8 | 5 | 554 | +6 |
| 8 | 3 | 132 | +8 | 3 | 216 | -11 |
| 9 | 4 | 319 | -11 | 4 | 490 | -6 |
| 10 | 4 | 349 | 0 | 4 | 350 | +12 |
| 11 | 3 | 158 | -1 | 5 | 510 | -7 |
| 12 | 4 | 290 | +8 | 4 | 475 | -16 |
| 13 | – | – | – | 3 | 161 | -1 |
| 14 | – | – | – | 4 | 330 | -44 |
| 15 | – | – | – | 5 | 547 | -8 |
| 16 | – | – | – | 3 | 197 | -22 |
| 17 | – | – | – | 4 | 458 | +1 |
| 18 | – | – | – | 5 | 583 | -15 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.