Como Park Golf Course vs Highland 9 Hole Golf Course

5.1 mi apart · numbers from each course's map geometry

Como Park Golf Course

St. Paul, Minnesota

Highland 9 Hole Golf Course

St. Paul, Minnesota

MeasureComo Park Golf CourseHighland 9 Hole Golf Course
Holes189
Par 3 · 4 · 54 · 11 · 30 · 0 · 0
Measured length5,820 yd2,718 yd
Longest holeNo. 8, 551 ydNo. 1, 407 yd
Bunkers3411
Sand1.1 acres0.5 acres
Holes with water80
Water on the property5 acres–
Total climb223 ft94 ft
Elevation884–945 ft898–968 ft
Biggest drop to a green-47 ft-31 ft
Average green5,254 sq ft4,233 sq ft
Average fairway width34 yd31 yd
Green to next tee, total1,313 yd551 yd
Property101 acres55 acres
Cart path2.4 mi0.2 mi
Driving rangenot mappednot mapped

Hole by hole

Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.

HoleComo Park Golf CourseHighland 9 Hole Golf Course
ParYdRiseParYdRise
14359-6–407+27
24311-14–164+8
34327-12–309-2
44302-13–368-17
54317+2–300-26
63170-12–374+39
74434+29–158-4
85551-37–316+6
93229-6–322-31
104368+10–––
114278-11–––
124361-3–––
133140-9–––
144350-47–––
154355-3–––
163134-2–––
1742352+37–––
185482-26–––

Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.