Como Park Golf Course vs Midland Hills Country Club
2.6 mi apart · numbers from each course's map geometry
Como Park Golf Course
St. Paul, Minnesota
Midland Hills Country Club
Roseville, Minnesota
| Measure | Como Park Golf Course | Midland Hills Country Club |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 18 |
| Par | – | 71 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 4 · 11 · 3 | 4 · 11 · 3 |
| Measured length | 5,820 yd | 6,718 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 8, 551 yd | No. 6, 571 yd |
| Bunkers | 34 | 72 |
| Sand | 1.1 acres | 0.9 acres |
| Holes with water | 8 | 10 |
| Water on the property | 5 acres | 8.1 acres |
| Total climb | 223 ft | 277 ft |
| Elevation | 884–945 ft | 927–983 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -47 ft | -25 ft |
| Average green | 5,254 sq ft | 7,696 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 34 yd | 44 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,313 yd | 1,398 yd |
| Property | 101 acres | 158 acres |
| Cart path | 2.4 mi | 2.7 mi |
| Driving range | not mapped | not mapped |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Como Park Golf Course | Midland Hills Country Club | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 4 | 359 | -6 | 4 | 333 | -22 |
| 2 | 4 | 311 | -14 | 4 | 378 | -4 |
| 3 | 4 | 327 | -12 | 4 | 415 | -25 |
| 4 | 4 | 302 | -13 | 3 | 138 | -2 |
| 5 | 4 | 317 | +2 | 4 | 432 | +29 |
| 6 | 3 | 170 | -12 | 5 | 571 | -23 |
| 7 | 4 | 434 | +29 | 3 | 188 | -12 |
| 8 | 5 | 551 | -37 | 4 | 318 | +29 |
| 9 | 3 | 229 | -6 | 4 | 395 | -10 |
| 10 | 4 | 368 | +10 | 5 | 562 | +19 |
| 11 | 4 | 278 | -11 | 4 | 424 | -12 |
| 12 | 4 | 361 | -3 | 3 | 235 | -9 |
| 13 | 3 | 140 | -9 | 4 | 384 | +14 |
| 14 | 4 | 350 | -47 | 4 | 454 | -1 |
| 15 | 4 | 355 | -3 | 4 | 377 | -14 |
| 16 | 3 | 134 | -2 | 3 | 207 | +1 |
| 17 | 42 | 352 | +37 | 5 | 547 | -21 |
| 18 | 5 | 482 | -26 | 4 | 360 | -3 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.