Copper River Country Club vs Fig Garden Golf Club
6.4 mi apart · numbers from each course's map geometry
Copper River Country Club
Fresno, California
Fig Garden Golf Club
near Fresno, California
| Measure | Copper River Country Club | Fig Garden Golf Club |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 19 | 18 |
| Par | – | 72 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 0 · 0 · 0 | 4 · 10 · 4 |
| Measured length | 6,216 yd | 6,480 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 15, 484 yd | No. 4, 564 yd |
| Bunkers | 3 | 31 |
| Sand | 0.1 acres | 1.8 acres |
| Holes with water | 7 | 3 |
| Water on the property | 7.2 acres | 0.2 acres |
| Total climb | 65 ft | 57 ft |
| Elevation | 355–395 ft | 252–306 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -14 ft | -19 ft |
| Average green | 5,344 sq ft | 4,428 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | – | 29 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 2,521 yd | 1,205 yd |
| Property | 184 acres | 115 acres |
| Cart path | 6.2 mi | 2.3 mi |
| Driving range | yes | not mapped |
| Access | Private | – |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Copper River Country Club | Fig Garden Golf Club | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | – | 359 | +4 | 4 | 332 | -2 |
| 2 | – | 459 | +6 | 4 | 374 | -2 |
| 3 | – | 351 | 0 | 3 | 171 | +6 |
| 4 | – | 443 | +1 | 5 | 564 | 0 |
| 5 | – | 141 | -5 | 4 | 443 | -2 |
| 6 | – | 324 | +5 | 5 | 561 | +2 |
| 7 | – | 377 | -14 | 3 | 211 | +2 |
| 8 | – | 123 | 0 | 4 | 371 | -7 |
| 9 | – | 351 | -1 | 4 | 294 | +2 |
| 10 | – | 348 | -2 | 4 | 396 | -4 |
| 11 | – | 132 | -1 | 3 | 173 | 0 |
| 12 | – | 456 | 0 | 4 | 317 | -1 |
| 13 | – | 379 | +8 | 4 | 349 | +8 |
| 14 | – | 400 | -3 | 4 | 369 | +6 |
| 15 | – | 484 | +8 | 4 | 412 | -7 |
| 16 | – | 334 | -1 | 5 | 521 | +10 |
| 17 | – | 130 | 0 | 3 | 179 | +7 |
| 18 | – | 359 | +1 | 5 | 443 | -19 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.