Course #1 at Ponkapoag Golf Course vs Course #2 at Ponkapoag Golf Course
Next to each other · numbers from each course's map geometry
Course #1 at Ponkapoag Golf Course
near Randolph, Massachusetts
Course #2 at Ponkapoag Golf Course
near Randolph, Massachusetts
| Measure | Course #1 at Ponkapoag Golf Course | Course #2 at Ponkapoag Golf Course |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 18 |
| Par | 72 | 71 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 4 · 10 · 4 | 4 · 11 · 3 |
| Measured length | 6,699 yd | 6,271 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 9, 512 yd | No. 10, 492 yd |
| Bunkers | 59 | 38 |
| Sand | 1.2 acres | 1.2 acres |
| Holes with water | 2 | 1 |
| Water on the property | 1.6 acres | 1.6 acres |
| Total climb | 269 ft | 179 ft |
| Elevation | 140–228 ft | 140–228 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -34 ft | -42 ft |
| Average green | 5,380 sq ft | 5,814 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 30 yd | 30 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,297 yd | 1,107 yd |
| Property | 333 acres | 333 acres |
| Cart path | 4.2 mi | 4.2 mi |
| Driving range | yes | yes |
| Access | Public | Public |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Course #1 at Ponkapoag Golf Course | Course #2 at Ponkapoag Golf Course | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 4 | 416 | +12 | 4 | 384 | +21 |
| 2 | 3 | 178 | -6 | 4 | 437 | -42 |
| 3 | 5 | 499 | +4 | 3 | 205 | +12 |
| 4 | 4 | 334 | +55 | 5 | 466 | -24 |
| 5 | 4 | 394 | +23 | 4 | 262 | +17 |
| 6 | 4 | 433 | -31 | 4 | 410 | +7 |
| 7 | 4 | 402 | -34 | 4 | 344 | -4 |
| 8 | 3 | 191 | +2 | 3 | 173 | +7 |
| 9 | 5 | 512 | +19 | 4 | 361 | -15 |
| 10 | 4 | 414 | -18 | 5 | 492 | +14 |
| 11 | 5 | 482 | +1 | 3 | 161 | 0 |
| 12 | 3 | 177 | +1 | 4 | 351 | -41 |
| 13 | 5 | 486 | -34 | 5 | 479 | +14 |
| 14 | 4 | 368 | +9 | 4 | 407 | +5 |
| 15 | 4 | 402 | +12 | 3 | 194 | -3 |
| 16 | 3 | 211 | +13 | 4 | 403 | -9 |
| 17 | 4 | 392 | +12 | 4 | 320 | +18 |
| 18 | 4 | 408 | -14 | 4 | 422 | +6 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.