Cross Creek Golf Course, course 1 of 4 vs Cross Creek Golf Course, course 2 of 4
Next to each other · numbers from each course's map geometry
Cross Creek Golf Course, course 1 of 4
near Sugarcreek, Pennsylvania
Cross Creek Golf Course, course 2 of 4
near Sugarcreek, Pennsylvania
| Measure | Cross Creek Golf Course, course 1 of 4 | Cross Creek Golf Course, course 2 of 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 16 |
| Par | 71 | 63 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 5 · 9 · 4 | 4 · 9 · 3 |
| Measured length | 5,968 yd | 4,804 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 12, 532 yd | No. 2, 524 yd |
| Bunkers | 10 | 17 |
| Sand | 0.2 acres | 0.3 acres |
| Holes with water | 2 | 2 |
| Water on the property | 4.7 acres | 4.7 acres |
| Total climb | 320 ft | 213 ft |
| Elevation | 1,412–1,590 ft | 1,412–1,590 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -40 ft | -34 ft |
| Average green | 3,718 sq ft | 3,349 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 29 yd | 33 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,234 yd | 1,274 yd |
| Property | 322 acres | 322 acres |
| Cart path | 6.7 mi | 6.7 mi |
| Driving range | not mapped | not mapped |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Cross Creek Golf Course, course 1 of 4 | Cross Creek Golf Course, course 2 of 4 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 5 | 448 | -28 | 4 | 259 | -16 |
| 2 | 4 | 359 | -4 | 5 | 524 | -1 |
| 3 | 3 | 178 | +9 | 3 | 175 | -30 |
| 4 | 4 | 330 | +4 | 4 | 389 | +42 |
| 5 | 3 | 137 | -1 | 4 | 321 | -19 |
| 6 | 4 | 358 | -40 | 5 | 351 | -11 |
| 7 | 5 | 455 | +92 | 3 | 142 | +23 |
| 8 | 4 | 388 | +1 | 4 | 432 | +2 |
| 9 | 4 | 306 | -16 | 4 | 366 | +6 |
| 10 | 4 | 353 | -16 | 4 | 409 | -18 |
| 11 | 3 | 162 | -11 | 3 | 130 | -9 |
| 12 | 5 | 532 | -36 | 5 | 436 | -20 |
| 13 | 4 | 341 | +27 | 4 | 231 | +37 |
| 14 | 3 | 219 | +15 | 4 | 178 | +9 |
| 15 | 4 | 345 | -40 | 4 | 301 | -34 |
| 16 | 3 | 247 | +2 | 3 | 160 | +23 |
| 17 | 5 | 432 | +40 | – | – | – |
| 18 | 4 | 378 | +20 | – | – | – |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.