Fairmont Park Golf Course vs Victoria Club
2.8 mi apart · numbers from each course's map geometry
Fairmont Park Golf Course
Riverside, California
Victoria Club
Riverside, California
| Measure | Fairmont Park Golf Course | Victoria Club |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 9 | 18 |
| Par | 36 | 72 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 2 · 5 · 2 | 5 · 8 · 5 |
| Measured length | 3,130 yd | 6,264 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 4, 520 yd | No. 4, 550 yd |
| Bunkers | 5 | 59 |
| Sand | 0.3 acres | 1.2 acres |
| Holes with water | 2 | 12 |
| Water on the property | 0.2 acres | 6.7 acres |
| Total climb | 68 ft | 205 ft |
| Elevation | 777–805 ft | 845–947 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -22 ft | -34 ft |
| Average green | 2,818 sq ft | 4,091 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 38 yd | 35 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 381 yd | 1,101 yd |
| Property | 55 acres | 138 acres |
| Cart path | – | 3.4 mi |
| Driving range | not mapped | yes |
| Access | Municipal | – |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Fairmont Park Golf Course | Victoria Club | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 4 | 358 | +8 | 4 | 362 | -9 |
| 2 | 3 | 215 | -5 | 4 | 300 | -32 |
| 3 | 4 | 344 | +14 | 4 | 365 | +19 |
| 4 | 5 | 520 | -9 | 5 | 550 | +8 |
| 5 | 3 | 160 | +6 | 3 | 139 | +11 |
| 6 | 4 | 319 | -22 | 4 | 442 | -6 |
| 7 | 4 | 285 | +20 | 4 | 355 | -34 |
| 8 | 5 | 469 | +5 | 3 | 194 | +21 |
| 9 | 4 | 460 | -13 | 4 | 383 | -17 |
| 10 | – | – | – | 4 | 416 | -4 |
| 11 | – | – | – | 3 | 193 | -11 |
| 12 | – | – | – | 4 | 411 | +19 |
| 13 | – | – | – | 3 | 194 | -20 |
| 14 | – | – | – | 5 | 391 | 0 |
| 15 | – | – | – | 5 | 483 | -29 |
| 16 | – | – | – | 3 | 194 | -2 |
| 17 | – | – | – | 5 | 458 | -26 |
| 18 | – | – | – | 5 | 434 | -12 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.