Forest Dunes Golf Resort, course 1 of 3 vs Forest Dunes Golf Resort, course 2 of 3
Next to each other · numbers from each course's map geometry
Forest Dunes Golf Resort, course 1 of 3
near Roscommon, Michigan
Forest Dunes Golf Resort, course 2 of 3
near Roscommon, Michigan
| Measure | Forest Dunes Golf Resort, course 1 of 3 | Forest Dunes Golf Resort, course 2 of 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 18 |
| Par | 70 | 72 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 5 · 10 · 3 | 4 · 10 · 4 |
| Measured length | 6,793 yd | 7,135 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 10, 617 yd | No. 5, 608 yd |
| Bunkers | 85 | 125 |
| Sand | 8.9 acres | 24.9 acres |
| Holes with water | 0 | 7 |
| Water on the property | 36.2 acres | 36.2 acres |
| Total climb | 106 ft | 118 ft |
| Elevation | 1,169–1,292 ft | 1,169–1,292 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -13 ft | -18 ft |
| Average green | 6,150 sq ft | 6,586 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | – | 45 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,016 yd | 1,722 yd |
| Property | 1,290 acres | 1,290 acres |
| Cart path | 11.0 mi | 11.0 mi |
| Driving range | not mapped | not mapped |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Forest Dunes Golf Resort, course 1 of 3 | Forest Dunes Golf Resort, course 2 of 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 4 | 487 | -2 | 4 | 412 | +6 |
| 2 | 3 | 186 | +1 | 4 | 452 | -9 |
| 3 | 4 | 419 | -4 | 3 | 200 | +7 |
| 4 | 4 | 351 | -6 | 4 | 405 | +4 |
| 5 | 3 | 187 | -5 | 5 | 608 | -12 |
| 6 | 5 | 517 | +14 | 4 | 359 | +7 |
| 7 | 4 | 318 | -10 | 5 | 544 | +11 |
| 8 | 3 | 142 | 0 | 4 | 447 | -18 |
| 9 | 4 | 496 | 0 | 3 | 200 | -7 |
| 10 | 5 | 617 | +1 | 4 | 444 | +11 |
| 11 | 4 | 411 | +2 | 3 | 188 | +5 |
| 12 | 4 | 387 | -13 | 4 | 394 | -8 |
| 13 | 3 | 226 | +9 | 4 | 382 | +8 |
| 14 | 4 | 491 | +10 | 4 | 460 | +9 |
| 15 | 3 | 225 | +2 | 5 | 555 | -10 |
| 16 | 4 | 436 | +1 | 3 | 234 | -14 |
| 17 | 5 | 536 | -5 | 4 | 318 | -10 |
| 18 | 4 | 361 | +1 | 5 | 533 | -14 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.