Fox Hollow Golf Course, course 1 of 5 vs Fox Hollow Golf Course, course 5 of 5
Next to each other · numbers from each course's map geometry
Fox Hollow Golf Course, course 1 of 5
Lakewood, Colorado
Fox Hollow Golf Course, course 5 of 5
Lakewood, Colorado
| Measure | Fox Hollow Golf Course, course 1 of 5 | Fox Hollow Golf Course, course 5 of 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 9 |
| Par | 72 | 36 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 4 · 10 · 4 | 2 · 5 · 2 |
| Measured length | 7,215 yd | 3,502 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 1, 604 yd | No. 6, 559 yd |
| Bunkers | 28 | 16 |
| Sand | 0.8 acres | 0.6 acres |
| Holes with water | 6 | 5 |
| Water on the property | 30.9 acres | 30.9 acres |
| Total climb | 337 ft | 219 ft |
| Elevation | 5,458–5,781 ft | 5,458–5,781 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -81 ft | -64 ft |
| Average green | 4,247 sq ft | 5,860 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 37 yd | 42 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,725 yd | 816 yd |
| Property | 1,363 acres | 1,363 acres |
| Cart path | 19.3 mi | 19.3 mi |
| Driving range | yes | yes |
| Access | Municipal | Municipal |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Fox Hollow Golf Course, course 1 of 5 | Fox Hollow Golf Course, course 5 of 5 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 5 | 604 | -77 | 4 | 394 | +63 |
| 2 | 4 | 445 | -49 | 3 | 175 | -18 |
| 3 | 3 | 224 | -35 | 4 | 400 | +59 |
| 4 | 4 | 452 | -55 | 5 | 536 | +49 |
| 5 | 4 | 420 | +37 | 4 | 446 | +37 |
| 6 | 4 | 439 | -81 | 5 | 559 | -44 |
| 7 | 3 | 118 | -32 | 4 | 426 | -64 |
| 8 | 4 | 411 | +10 | 3 | 168 | -41 |
| 9 | 5 | 557 | +50 | 4 | 398 | -64 |
| 10 | 4 | 397 | +40 | – | – | – |
| 11 | 4 | 410 | -39 | – | – | – |
| 12 | 5 | 570 | +34 | – | – | – |
| 13 | 3 | 174 | -51 | – | – | – |
| 14 | 5 | 526 | +21 | – | – | – |
| 15 | 4 | 424 | -56 | – | – | – |
| 16 | 4 | 435 | -36 | – | – | – |
| 17 | 3 | 214 | -16 | – | – | – |
| 18 | 4 | 395 | +33 | – | – | – |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.