Gardner Municipal Golf Course vs Woods of Westminster Golf Course
5.5 mi apart · numbers from each course's map geometry
Gardner Municipal Golf Course
Gardner, Massachusetts
Woods of Westminster Golf Course
near Fitchburg, Massachusetts
| Measure | Gardner Municipal Golf Course | Woods of Westminster Golf Course |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 19 |
| Par | 71 | – |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 5 · 9 · 4 | 4 · 10 · 4 |
| Measured length | 5,963 yd | 5,546 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 5, 544 yd | No. 3, 538 yd |
| Bunkers | 40 | 16 |
| Sand | 0.7 acres | 0.2 acres |
| Holes with water | 6 | 4 |
| Water on the property | 0.8 acres | 1.5 acres |
| Total climb | 365 ft | 287 ft |
| Elevation | 1,066–1,186 ft | 924–1,099 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -58 ft | -116 ft |
| Average green | 4,695 sq ft | 4,443 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 29 yd | 26 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,102 yd | 2,027 yd |
| Property | 160 acres | 165 acres |
| Cart path | – | 4.4 mi |
| Driving range | yes | yes |
| Access | Municipal | – |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Gardner Municipal Golf Course | Woods of Westminster Golf Course | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 4 | 324 | -33 | 5 | 456 | -58 |
| 2 | 4 | 285 | +16 | 4 | 302 | -7 |
| 3 | 3 | 258 | -26 | 5 | 538 | -21 |
| 4 | 4 | 307 | +21 | 4 | 310 | +17 |
| 5 | 5 | 544 | -32 | 4 | 313 | +14 |
| 6 | 3 | 165 | -15 | 3 | 198 | -6 |
| 7 | 5 | 537 | -8 | 4 | 385 | +17 |
| 8 | 3 | 139 | +3 | 3 | 137 | +7 |
| 9 | 4 | 385 | +23 | 4 | 293 | -116 |
| 10 | 4 | 295 | -58 | 5 | 332 | -63 |
| 11 | 5 | 479 | +15 | 4 | 223 | +49 |
| 12 | 4 | 330 | +3 | 4 | 328 | -46 |
| 13 | 4 | 375 | -12 | 5 | 401 | +6 |
| 14 | 3 | 134 | +1 | 3 | 171 | +27 |
| 15 | 5 | 454 | +44 | 4 | 288 | +20 |
| 16 | 3 | 241 | -16 | 3 | 128 | +12 |
| 17 | 4 | 355 | -13 | 4 | 282 | -7 |
| 18 | 4 | 356 | +33 | 4 | 349 | -33 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.