Garland Lodge & Resort, course 1 of 5 vs Garland Lodge & Resort, course 3 of 5
Next to each other · numbers from each course's map geometry
Garland Lodge & Resort, course 1 of 5
near Lewiston, Michigan
Garland Lodge & Resort, course 3 of 5
near Lewiston, Michigan
| Measure | Garland Lodge & Resort, course 1 of 5 | Garland Lodge & Resort, course 3 of 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 18 |
| Par | 72 | 72 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 6 · 6 · 6 | 6 · 6 · 6 |
| Measured length | 6,648 yd | 6,042 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 7, 572 yd | No. 15, 522 yd |
| Bunkers | 41 | 60 |
| Sand | 1.1 acres | 1.5 acres |
| Holes with water | 10 | 6 |
| Water on the property | 85.1 acres | 85.1 acres |
| Total climb | 143 ft | 141 ft |
| Elevation | 1,182–1,292 ft | 1,182–1,292 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -26 ft | -19 ft |
| Average green | 5,909 sq ft | 5,159 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 38 yd | 30 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,862 yd | 2,919 yd |
| Property | 1,327 acres | 1,327 acres |
| Cart path | 23.5 mi | 23.5 mi |
| Driving range | not mapped | not mapped |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Garland Lodge & Resort, course 1 of 5 | Garland Lodge & Resort, course 3 of 5 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 4 | 391 | +15 | 4 | 366 | +28 |
| 2 | 5 | 520 | -17 | 5 | 462 | -8 |
| 3 | 3 | 163 | 0 | 4 | 328 | -2 |
| 4 | 4 | 406 | +32 | 3 | 147 | -5 |
| 5 | 3 | 186 | -22 | 5 | 515 | -14 |
| 6 | 4 | 377 | -24 | 3 | 126 | -2 |
| 7 | 5 | 572 | -1 | 4 | 385 | -1 |
| 8 | 5 | 523 | -12 | 5 | 472 | -11 |
| 9 | 3 | 181 | -10 | 3 | 169 | -19 |
| 10 | 5 | 507 | +10 | 5 | 492 | +2 |
| 11 | 3 | 171 | +10 | 3 | 164 | +10 |
| 12 | 5 | 526 | +8 | 5 | 487 | +8 |
| 13 | 4 | 417 | +5 | 4 | 342 | +14 |
| 14 | 4 | 413 | -26 | 4 | 323 | +7 |
| 15 | 5 | 481 | -11 | 5 | 522 | -7 |
| 16 | 3 | 178 | +5 | 3 | 159 | -6 |
| 17 | 4 | 450 | 0 | 4 | 385 | +18 |
| 18 | 3 | 186 | -2 | 3 | 198 | 0 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.