Garland Lodge & Resort, course 1 of 5 vs Garland Lodge & Resort, course 4 of 5
Next to each other · numbers from each course's map geometry
Garland Lodge & Resort, course 1 of 5
near Lewiston, Michigan
Garland Lodge & Resort, course 4 of 5
near Lewiston, Michigan
| Measure | Garland Lodge & Resort, course 1 of 5 | Garland Lodge & Resort, course 4 of 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 11 |
| Par | 72 | 45 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 6 · 6 · 6 | 2 · 6 · 3 |
| Measured length | 6,648 yd | 4,231 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 7, 572 yd | No. 10, 554 yd |
| Bunkers | 41 | 15 |
| Sand | 1.1 acres | 0.4 acres |
| Holes with water | 10 | 7 |
| Water on the property | 85.1 acres | 85.1 acres |
| Total climb | 143 ft | 25 ft |
| Elevation | 1,182–1,292 ft | 1,182–1,292 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -26 ft | -13 ft |
| Average green | 5,909 sq ft | 4,692 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 38 yd | 34 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,862 yd | 1,668 yd |
| Property | 1,327 acres | 1,327 acres |
| Cart path | 23.5 mi | 23.5 mi |
| Driving range | not mapped | not mapped |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Garland Lodge & Resort, course 1 of 5 | Garland Lodge & Resort, course 4 of 5 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 4 | 391 | +15 | 4 | 430 | -2 |
| 2 | 5 | 520 | -17 | 4 | 387 | +1 |
| 3 | 3 | 163 | 0 | 3 | 187 | -3 |
| 4 | 4 | 406 | +32 | 4 | 358 | 0 |
| 5 | 3 | 186 | -22 | 5 | 476 | -2 |
| 6 | 4 | 377 | -24 | 3 | 137 | 0 |
| 7 | 5 | 572 | -1 | 4 | 407 | 0 |
| 8 | 5 | 523 | -12 | 5 | 518 | -13 |
| 9 | 3 | 181 | -10 | 4 | 348 | -8 |
| 10 | 5 | 507 | +10 | 5 | 554 | -6 |
| 11 | 3 | 171 | +10 | 4 | 429 | -3 |
| 12 | 5 | 526 | +8 | – | – | – |
| 13 | 4 | 417 | +5 | – | – | – |
| 14 | 4 | 413 | -26 | – | – | – |
| 15 | 5 | 481 | -11 | – | – | – |
| 16 | 3 | 178 | +5 | – | – | – |
| 17 | 4 | 450 | 0 | – | – | – |
| 18 | 3 | 186 | -2 | – | – | – |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.