Gatlinburg Golf Course, course 1 of 4 vs Sevierville Golf Club, course 2 of 2
8.6 mi apart · numbers from each course's map geometry
Gatlinburg Golf Course, course 1 of 4
Pigeon Forge, Tennessee
Sevierville Golf Club, course 2 of 2
Sevierville, Tennessee
| Measure | Gatlinburg Golf Course, course 1 of 4 | Sevierville Golf Club, course 2 of 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 18 |
| Par | 71 | – |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 5 · 9 · 4 | 6 · 7 · 4 |
| Measured length | 5,563 yd | 6,156 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 3, 473 yd | No. 9, 530 yd |
| Bunkers | 10 | 27 |
| Sand | 0.2 acres | 1 acres |
| Holes with water | 1 | 11 |
| Water on the property | 1.2 acres | 37.2 acres |
| Total climb | 531 ft | 205 ft |
| Elevation | 1,020–1,178 ft | 870–1,038 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -160 ft | -66 ft |
| Average green | 4,902 sq ft | 5,720 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 31 yd | 51 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,464 yd | 2,900 yd |
| Property | 134 acres | 533 acres |
| Cart path | 5.0 mi | 4.9 mi |
| Driving range | not mapped | not mapped |
| Access | Municipal | Municipal |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Gatlinburg Golf Course, course 1 of 4 | Sevierville Golf Club, course 2 of 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 4 | 387 | -86 | 5 | 476 | -3 |
| 2 | 4 | 365 | +45 | – | 399 | -6 |
| 3 | 5 | 473 | -62 | 5 | 493 | +11 |
| 4 | 5 | 418 | +29 | 4 | 354 | 0 |
| 5 | 3 | 139 | -40 | 4 | 344 | 0 |
| 6 | 4 | 249 | -5 | 3 | 213 | -3 |
| 7 | 4 | 359 | -15 | 4 | 394 | -66 |
| 8 | 3 | 126 | +21 | 3 | 208 | +2 |
| 9 | 5 | 463 | +50 | 5 | 530 | -36 |
| 10 | 5 | 460 | -56 | 4 | 377 | 0 |
| 11 | 4 | 332 | +70 | 3 | 159 | -12 |
| 12 | 3 | 195 | -160 | 4 | 396 | +18 |
| 13 | 4 | 300 | +25 | 3 | 177 | -43 |
| 14 | 3 | 175 | +30 | 4 | 413 | +16 |
| 15 | 4 | 347 | -87 | 4 | 366 | -1 |
| 16 | 4 | 266 | -3 | 3 | 229 | -2 |
| 17 | 3 | 184 | +40 | 5 | 480 | -13 |
| 18 | 4 | 325 | +12 | 3 | 148 | 0 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.