Gold Course at Cedarbrook Golf Course vs Red Course at Cedarbrook Golf Course
Next to each other · numbers from each course's map geometry
Gold Course at Cedarbrook Golf Course
near California, Pennsylvania
Red Course at Cedarbrook Golf Course
near California, Pennsylvania
| Measure | Gold Course at Cedarbrook Golf Course | Red Course at Cedarbrook Golf Course |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 18 |
| Par | 72 | 71 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 4 · 10 · 4 | 4 · 11 · 3 |
| Measured length | 6,745 yd | 6,050 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 10, 584 yd | No. 13, 550 yd |
| Bunkers | 66 | 57 |
| Sand | 1 acres | 1.1 acres |
| Holes with water | 8 | 4 |
| Water on the property | 3 acres | 3 acres |
| Total climb | 335 ft | 296 ft |
| Elevation | 896–1,026 ft | 896–1,026 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -71 ft | -69 ft |
| Average green | 4,528 sq ft | 4,150 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 26 yd | 29 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,603 yd | 1,234 yd |
| Property | 294 acres | 294 acres |
| Cart path | 0.0 mi | 0.0 mi |
| Driving range | not mapped | not mapped |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Gold Course at Cedarbrook Golf Course | Red Course at Cedarbrook Golf Course | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 4 | 369 | -11 | 4 | 388 | -9 |
| 2 | 3 | 203 | -51 | 5 | 519 | -53 |
| 3 | 4 | 351 | +18 | 3 | 112 | -7 |
| 4 | 5 | 457 | -17 | 4 | 322 | -16 |
| 5 | 4 | 299 | -19 | 3 | 131 | +1 |
| 6 | 5 | 579 | +28 | 4 | 389 | +15 |
| 7 | 3 | 190 | -15 | 4 | 315 | -18 |
| 8 | 4 | 389 | +25 | 4 | 312 | +54 |
| 9 | 4 | 358 | +1 | 4 | 382 | +31 |
| 10 | 5 | 584 | -71 | 5 | 525 | -69 |
| 11 | 3 | 182 | -33 | 3 | 158 | -12 |
| 12 | 5 | 523 | +55 | 4 | 293 | +41 |
| 13 | 4 | 380 | -16 | 5 | 550 | -36 |
| 14 | 3 | 202 | 0 | 4 | 382 | -11 |
| 15 | 4 | 459 | -5 | 3 | 171 | -10 |
| 16 | 4 | 474 | +33 | 4 | 370 | -18 |
| 17 | 4 | 360 | -59 | 4 | 380 | -13 |
| 18 | 4 | 386 | +93 | 4 | 351 | +52 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.