Great Oaks Country Club vs Oakland University Golf and Learning Center, course 1 of 2
3.1 mi apart · numbers from each course's map geometry
Great Oaks Country Club
Rochester Hills, Michigan
Oakland University Golf and Learning Center, course 1 of 2
Rochester Hills, Michigan
| Measure | Great Oaks Country Club | Oakland University Golf and Learning Center, course 1 of 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 18 |
| Par | 71 | – |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 4 · 11 · 3 | 0 · 0 · 0 |
| Measured length | 6,504 yd | 6,995 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 17, 552 yd | No. 18, 609 yd |
| Bunkers | 49 | 51 |
| Sand | 1 acres | 1.6 acres |
| Holes with water | 12 | 8 |
| Water on the property | 4 acres | 4.1 acres |
| Total climb | 208 ft | 275 ft |
| Elevation | 769–871 ft | 827–925 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -42 ft | -45 ft |
| Average green | 5,746 sq ft | 5,295 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 34 yd | 34 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,227 yd | 1,871 yd |
| Property | 139 acres | 508 acres |
| Cart path | 3.9 mi | 11.0 mi |
| Driving range | not mapped | yes |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Great Oaks Country Club | Oakland University Golf and Learning Center, course 1 of 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 4 | 384 | -14 | – | 491 | -32 |
| 2 | 4 | 351 | +23 | – | 456 | +5 |
| 3 | 3 | 190 | +13 | – | 175 | +29 |
| 4 | 4 | 404 | +21 | – | 359 | -44 |
| 5 | 4 | 375 | -28 | – | 395 | -16 |
| 6 | 4 | 315 | +14 | – | 552 | +13 |
| 7 | 5 | 540 | -41 | – | 448 | 0 |
| 8 | 3 | 194 | -7 | – | 207 | -5 |
| 9 | 5 | 505 | -2 | – | 397 | +23 |
| 10 | 4 | 425 | -11 | – | 417 | -45 |
| 11 | 3 | 183 | +3 | – | 401 | -18 |
| 12 | 4 | 333 | +32 | – | 198 | -15 |
| 13 | 4 | 420 | -42 | – | 440 | -19 |
| 14 | 4 | 387 | +32 | – | 366 | +3 |
| 15 | 4 | 384 | -41 | – | 203 | +9 |
| 16 | 3 | 149 | -30 | – | 508 | -26 |
| 17 | 5 | 552 | +11 | – | 373 | +9 |
| 18 | 4 | 413 | +16 | – | 609 | +54 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.