Hampshire Country Club, course 2 of 2 vs Indian Lake Hills Golf Course, course 1 of 2
6.7 mi apart · numbers from each course's map geometry
Hampshire Country Club, course 2 of 2
near Dowagiac, Michigan
Indian Lake Hills Golf Course, course 1 of 2
near Dowagiac, Michigan
| Measure | Hampshire Country Club, course 2 of 2 | Indian Lake Hills Golf Course, course 1 of 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 18 |
| Par | 72 | 70 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 4 · 10 · 4 | 2 · 13 · 2 |
| Measured length | 6,511 yd | 5,787 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 13, 561 yd | No. 11, 522 yd |
| Bunkers | 22 | 28 |
| Sand | 0.7 acres | 0.5 acres |
| Holes with water | 3 | 2 |
| Water on the property | 1.2 acres | 2.6 acres |
| Total climb | 227 ft | 220 ft |
| Elevation | 786–819 ft | 756–822 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -17 ft | -16 ft |
| Average green | 5,066 sq ft | 4,594 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 40 yd | 29 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,554 yd | 1,100 yd |
| Property | 262 acres | 221 acres |
| Cart path | 2.8 mi | 1.7 mi |
| Driving range | not mapped | not mapped |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Hampshire Country Club, course 2 of 2 | Indian Lake Hills Golf Course, course 1 of 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 4 | 347 | -1 | 4 | 290 | +6 |
| 2 | 4 | 307 | +16 | 3 | 150 | -12 |
| 3 | 4 | 351 | -3 | 4 | 379 | +11 |
| 4 | 3 | 191 | -7 | 5 | 361 | +10 |
| 5 | 5 | 524 | +19 | 3 | 191 | -4 |
| 6 | 3 | 127 | +12 | 4 | 407 | +13 |
| 7 | 4 | 373 | +7 | 4 | 345 | -2 |
| 8 | 4 | 450 | -14 | 4 | 285 | -3 |
| 9 | 5 | 486 | -11 | 4 | 305 | +4 |
| 10 | 5 | 546 | 0 | 4 | 298 | +2 |
| 11 | 3 | 155 | +1 | 5 | 522 | +19 |
| 12 | 4 | 375 | -17 | 4 | 330 | -9 |
| 13 | 5 | 561 | +7 | 4 | 384 | +7 |
| 14 | 4 | 396 | -17 | 4 | 336 | -16 |
| 15 | 3 | 141 | +13 | 4 | 403 | -2 |
| 16 | 4 | 399 | +10 | 2 | 146 | +4 |
| 17 | 4 | 366 | -13 | 4 | 341 | -6 |
| 18 | 4 | 416 | -4 | 4 | 314 | -6 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.