Harborside International Golf Center, course 2 of 2 vs Lost Marsh Golf Course
5.1 mi apart · numbers from each course's map geometry
Harborside International Golf Center, course 2 of 2
Chicago, Illinois
Lost Marsh Golf Course
Hammond, Indiana
| Measure | Harborside International Golf Center, course 2 of 2 | Lost Marsh Golf Course |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 18 |
| Par | 72 | 72 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 4 · 10 · 4 | 4 · 10 · 4 |
| Measured length | 6,936 yd | 6,656 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 11, 561 yd | No. 10, 557 yd |
| Bunkers | 92 | 26 |
| Sand | 8.5 acres | 0.4 acres |
| Holes with water | 0 | 10 |
| Water on the property | 0.7 acres | 48.5 acres |
| Total climb | 121 ft | 186 ft |
| Elevation | 574–594 ft | 583–592 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -31 ft | -31 ft |
| Average green | 5,710 sq ft | 5,353 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 47 yd | 40 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,352 yd | 1,575 yd |
| Property | 433 acres | 235 acres |
| Cart path | 11.6 mi | 5.0 mi |
| Driving range | yes | not mapped |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Harborside International Golf Center, course 2 of 2 | Lost Marsh Golf Course | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 5 | 553 | +23 | 5 | 339 | -31 |
| 2 | 4 | 376 | -19 | 3 | 185 | +26 |
| 3 | 4 | 332 | +9 | 4 | 475 | -6 |
| 4 | 3 | 161 | -4 | 4 | 501 | -4 |
| 5 | 5 | 514 | +8 | 5 | 266 | +1 |
| 6 | 4 | 445 | -14 | 4 | 393 | +4 |
| 7 | 4 | 396 | +11 | 4 | 460 | -3 |
| 8 | 3 | 210 | +1 | 3 | 160 | +7 |
| 9 | 4 | 484 | -20 | 4 | 444 | 0 |
| 10 | 4 | 404 | +17 | 4 | 557 | -23 |
| 11 | 5 | 561 | -15 | 3 | 173 | +9 |
| 12 | 4 | 445 | +1 | 4 | 385 | 0 |
| 13 | 3 | 153 | -4 | 5 | 394 | -2 |
| 14 | 4 | 365 | +9 | 4 | 515 | -11 |
| 15 | 3 | 216 | -16 | 4 | 400 | +9 |
| 16 | 4 | 393 | -31 | 5 | 329 | +7 |
| 17 | 4 | 407 | +9 | 3 | 207 | +12 |
| 18 | 5 | 521 | +2 | 4 | 473 | -1 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.