Kettle Hills Golf Course, course 1 of 3 vs Kettle Hills Golf Course, course 2 of 3
Next to each other · numbers from each course's map geometry
Kettle Hills Golf Course, course 1 of 3
Richfield, Wisconsin
Kettle Hills Golf Course, course 2 of 3
Richfield, Wisconsin
| Measure | Kettle Hills Golf Course, course 1 of 3 | Kettle Hills Golf Course, course 2 of 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 18 |
| Par | 72 | 72 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 4 · 10 · 4 | 4 · 10 · 4 |
| Measured length | 6,722 yd | 6,277 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 18, 551 yd | No. 10, 530 yd |
| Bunkers | 17 | 23 |
| Sand | 0.6 acres | 0.6 acres |
| Holes with water | 10 | 8 |
| Water on the property | 5.4 acres | 5.4 acres |
| Total climb | 213 ft | 238 ft |
| Elevation | 981–1,090 ft | 981–1,090 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -30 ft | -54 ft |
| Average green | 4,609 sq ft | 4,195 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 29 yd | 23 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,224 yd | 1,241 yd |
| Property | 357 acres | 357 acres |
| Cart path | 7.0 mi | 7.0 mi |
| Driving range | not mapped | not mapped |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Kettle Hills Golf Course, course 1 of 3 | Kettle Hills Golf Course, course 2 of 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 4 | 419 | 0 | 4 | 360 | +33 |
| 2 | 4 | 392 | -2 | 4 | 369 | -54 |
| 3 | 3 | 195 | -14 | 5 | 448 | +25 |
| 4 | 4 | 384 | -15 | 3 | 205 | -10 |
| 5 | 5 | 521 | +13 | 4 | 426 | -25 |
| 6 | 4 | 380 | -21 | 4 | 389 | +27 |
| 7 | 5 | 497 | -14 | 4 | 328 | +14 |
| 8 | 3 | 171 | -11 | 3 | 135 | -7 |
| 9 | 4 | 419 | +48 | 4 | 400 | +3 |
| 10 | 4 | 383 | +29 | 5 | 530 | -24 |
| 11 | 4 | 371 | -18 | 5 | 499 | -14 |
| 12 | 3 | 171 | -30 | 4 | 348 | -4 |
| 13 | 4 | 362 | +9 | 4 | 378 | +3 |
| 14 | 5 | 540 | -7 | 4 | 360 | -6 |
| 15 | 4 | 401 | -5 | 3 | 164 | -1 |
| 16 | 3 | 177 | -3 | 5 | 485 | +5 |
| 17 | 4 | 388 | -20 | 3 | 113 | +41 |
| 18 | 5 | 551 | -23 | 4 | 340 | +13 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.