North Course at Coto de Caza Golf & Racquet Club vs Oso Creek Golf Course
4.2 mi apart · numbers from each course's map geometry
North Course at Coto de Caza Golf & Racquet Club
near Rancho Santa Margarita, California
Oso Creek Golf Course
Mission Viejo, California
| Measure | North Course at Coto de Caza Golf & Racquet Club | Oso Creek Golf Course |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 18 |
| Par | 72 | 59 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 4 · 10 · 4 | 13 · 5 · 0 |
| Measured length | 6,726 yd | 3,458 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 10, 529 yd | No. 9, 316 yd |
| Bunkers | 78 | 29 |
| Sand | 4 acres | 0.6 acres |
| Holes with water | 3 | 9 |
| Water on the property | 11.4 acres | 1.5 acres |
| Total climb | 265 ft | 190 ft |
| Elevation | 458–874 ft | 542–677 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -64 ft | -25 ft |
| Average green | 5,842 sq ft | 3,797 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 40 yd | 30 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,690 yd | 1,183 yd |
| Property | 420 acres | 78 acres |
| Cart path | – | 2.8 mi |
| Driving range | not mapped | not mapped |
| Access | Private | – |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | North Course at Coto de Caza Golf & Racquet Club | Oso Creek Golf Course | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 5 | 482 | +26 | 4 | 268 | +5 |
| 2 | 4 | 349 | +5 | 3 | 167 | -8 |
| 3 | 4 | 403 | +13 | 3 | 138 | +8 |
| 4 | 3 | 185 | -27 | 4 | 265 | -3 |
| 5 | 5 | 441 | +17 | 3 | 164 | +28 |
| 6 | 3 | 204 | +19 | 4 | 292 | -25 |
| 7 | 4 | 410 | +26 | 3 | 147 | -1 |
| 8 | 4 | 426 | +20 | 3 | 158 | -4 |
| 9 | 4 | 300 | -30 | 4 | 316 | -10 |
| 10 | 5 | 529 | -64 | 3 | 158 | +17 |
| 11 | 3 | 189 | -2 | 3 | 165 | +22 |
| 12 | 5 | 482 | +30 | 3 | 114 | -15 |
| 13 | 4 | 450 | -38 | 4 | 285 | +22 |
| 14 | 4 | 465 | -29 | 3 | 144 | +10 |
| 15 | 3 | 170 | -5 | 3 | 157 | -12 |
| 16 | 4 | 443 | -38 | 3 | 158 | -8 |
| 17 | 4 | 423 | -24 | 3 | 164 | -13 |
| 18 | 4 | 375 | -29 | 3 | 198 | -7 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.