Oakland Hills Country Club, course 1 of 2 vs Oakland Hills Country Club, course 2 of 2
Next to each other · numbers from each course's map geometry
Oakland Hills Country Club, course 1 of 2
near Southfield, Michigan
Oakland Hills Country Club, course 2 of 2
near Southfield, Michigan
| Measure | Oakland Hills Country Club, course 1 of 2 | Oakland Hills Country Club, course 2 of 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 18 |
| Par | 70 | 72 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 4 · 12 · 2 | 4 · 10 · 4 |
| Measured length | 6,888 yd | 7,360 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 5, 636 yd | No. 12, 577 yd |
| Bunkers | 94 | 81 |
| Sand | 3.1 acres | 3.5 acres |
| Holes with water | 7 | 2 |
| Water on the property | 4.7 acres | 4.7 acres |
| Total climb | 245 ft | 257 ft |
| Elevation | 759–863 ft | 759–863 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -37 ft | -38 ft |
| Average green | 5,053 sq ft | 7,658 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 36 yd | 43 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,095 yd | 1,078 yd |
| Property | 295 acres | 295 acres |
| Cart path | 3.8 mi | 3.8 mi |
| Driving range | yes | yes |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Oakland Hills Country Club, course 1 of 2 | Oakland Hills Country Club, course 2 of 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 4 | 352 | -37 | 4 | 426 | -30 |
| 2 | 4 | 412 | -2 | 5 | 543 | -16 |
| 3 | 4 | 401 | +8 | 3 | 219 | +7 |
| 4 | 3 | 211 | +29 | 4 | 481 | -28 |
| 5 | 5 | 636 | -37 | 4 | 496 | -15 |
| 6 | 3 | 221 | -2 | 5 | 387 | +21 |
| 7 | 4 | 423 | -4 | 4 | 423 | -5 |
| 8 | 4 | 479 | +11 | 5 | 474 | +27 |
| 9 | 4 | 457 | +39 | 3 | 255 | +2 |
| 10 | 3 | 179 | -5 | 4 | 449 | -21 |
| 11 | 4 | 474 | -36 | 4 | 453 | +16 |
| 12 | 5 | 515 | -9 | 5 | 577 | -38 |
| 13 | 3 | 175 | -5 | 3 | 183 | -2 |
| 14 | 4 | 414 | +6 | 4 | 475 | -23 |
| 15 | 4 | 308 | -10 | 4 | 387 | +26 |
| 16 | 4 | 379 | +15 | 4 | 393 | -6 |
| 17 | 4 | 455 | +22 | 3 | 236 | +11 |
| 18 | 4 | 397 | +2 | 4 | 503 | +8 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.