Oakland University Golf and Learning Center, course 2 of 2 vs Pine Trace Golf Club
2.8 mi apart · numbers from each course's map geometry
Oakland University Golf and Learning Center, course 2 of 2
Rochester Hills, Michigan
Pine Trace Golf Club
Rochester Hills, Michigan
| Measure | Oakland University Golf and Learning Center, course 2 of 2 | Pine Trace Golf Club |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 18 |
| Par | 72 | 72 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 4 · 10 · 4 | 5 · 8 · 5 |
| Measured length | 7,064 yd | 6,455 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 18, 566 yd | No. 3, 590 yd |
| Bunkers | 64 | 31 |
| Sand | 1.7 acres | 0.4 acres |
| Holes with water | 0 | 7 |
| Water on the property | 4.1 acres | 9.3 acres |
| Total climb | 262 ft | 187 ft |
| Elevation | 827–925 ft | 803–858 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -59 ft | -28 ft |
| Average green | 5,874 sq ft | 4,851 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 45 yd | 39 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 3,389 yd | 2,245 yd |
| Property | 508 acres | 189 acres |
| Cart path | 11.0 mi | 5.0 mi |
| Driving range | yes | yes |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Oakland University Golf and Learning Center, course 2 of 2 | Pine Trace Golf Club | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 4 | 464 | -18 | 4 | 396 | -11 |
| 2 | 4 | 408 | +12 | 3 | 181 | -7 |
| 3 | 3 | 199 | -24 | 5 | 590 | -17 |
| 4 | 4 | 424 | +28 | 4 | 327 | -10 |
| 5 | 4 | 436 | -3 | 3 | 150 | +2 |
| 6 | 5 | 549 | -30 | 4 | 351 | 0 |
| 7 | 3 | 153 | +9 | 3 | 188 | +3 |
| 8 | 4 | 450 | -59 | 5 | 449 | +22 |
| 9 | 5 | 542 | +35 | 5 | 530 | -28 |
| 10 | 5 | 532 | -36 | 4 | 325 | +16 |
| 11 | 4 | 442 | +6 | 4 | 332 | -16 |
| 12 | 4 | 302 | -21 | 4 | 368 | -9 |
| 13 | 4 | 353 | -30 | 3 | 192 | 0 |
| 14 | 3 | 224 | -10 | 5 | 540 | -14 |
| 15 | 4 | 402 | -54 | 4 | 369 | -10 |
| 16 | 3 | 197 | -6 | 5 | 530 | +32 |
| 17 | 4 | 421 | -30 | 3 | 212 | -22 |
| 18 | 5 | 566 | -1 | 4 | 425 | +8 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.