Oso Creek Golf Course vs South Course at Coto de Caza Golf & Racquet Club
4.2 mi apart · numbers from each course's map geometry
Oso Creek Golf Course
Mission Viejo, California
South Course at Coto de Caza Golf & Racquet Club
near Rancho Santa Margarita, California
| Measure | Oso Creek Golf Course | South Course at Coto de Caza Golf & Racquet Club |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 18 |
| Par | 59 | 72 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 13 · 5 · 0 | 4 · 10 · 4 |
| Measured length | 3,458 yd | 6,684 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 9, 316 yd | No. 12, 555 yd |
| Bunkers | 29 | 81 |
| Sand | 0.6 acres | 3.8 acres |
| Holes with water | 9 | 5 |
| Water on the property | 1.5 acres | 11.4 acres |
| Total climb | 190 ft | 212 ft |
| Elevation | 542–677 ft | 458–874 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -25 ft | -82 ft |
| Average green | 3,797 sq ft | 3,892 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 30 yd | 40 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,183 yd | 2,084 yd |
| Property | 78 acres | 420 acres |
| Cart path | 2.8 mi | – |
| Driving range | not mapped | not mapped |
| Access | – | Private |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Oso Creek Golf Course | South Course at Coto de Caza Golf & Racquet Club | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 4 | 268 | +5 | 4 | 380 | -45 |
| 2 | 3 | 167 | -8 | 4 | 354 | -29 |
| 3 | 3 | 138 | +8 | 5 | 517 | -18 |
| 4 | 4 | 265 | -3 | 3 | 128 | -6 |
| 5 | 3 | 164 | +28 | 4 | 374 | +26 |
| 6 | 4 | 292 | -25 | 5 | 548 | -82 |
| 7 | 3 | 147 | -1 | 4 | 396 | +16 |
| 8 | 3 | 158 | -4 | 3 | 188 | -2 |
| 9 | 4 | 316 | -10 | 4 | 475 | -50 |
| 10 | 3 | 158 | +17 | 3 | 209 | -13 |
| 11 | 3 | 165 | +22 | 4 | 407 | +12 |
| 12 | 3 | 114 | -15 | 5 | 555 | +4 |
| 13 | 4 | 285 | +22 | 4 | 421 | +15 |
| 14 | 3 | 144 | +10 | 4 | 410 | +6 |
| 15 | 3 | 157 | -12 | 4 | 352 | +14 |
| 16 | 3 | 158 | -8 | 3 | 134 | -9 |
| 17 | 3 | 164 | -13 | 4 | 315 | +11 |
| 18 | 3 | 198 | -7 | 5 | 521 | +21 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.