Payne's Valley Golf Course, course 1 of 2 vs Payne's Valley Golf Course, course 2 of 2
Next to each other · numbers from each course's map geometry
Payne's Valley Golf Course, course 1 of 2
near Branson, Missouri
Payne's Valley Golf Course, course 2 of 2
near Branson, Missouri
| Measure | Payne's Valley Golf Course, course 1 of 2 | Payne's Valley Golf Course, course 2 of 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 13 |
| Par | 72 | 39 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 4 · 10 · 4 | 13 · 0 · 0 |
| Measured length | 7,317 yd | 1,816 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 13, 645 yd | No. 2, 220 yd |
| Bunkers | 71 | 25 |
| Sand | 3.2 acres | 1.2 acres |
| Holes with water | 7 | 0 |
| Water on the property | 13.3 acres | 13.3 acres |
| Total climb | 477 ft | 125 ft |
| Elevation | 820–1,293 ft | 820–1,293 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -108 ft | -61 ft |
| Average green | 6,866 sq ft | 6,275 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 65 yd | – |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,582 yd | 679 yd |
| Property | 499 acres | 499 acres |
| Cart path | 0.0 mi | 0.0 mi |
| Driving range | not mapped | not mapped |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Payne's Valley Golf Course, course 1 of 2 | Payne's Valley Golf Course, course 2 of 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 4 | 484 | -108 | 3 | 106 | -5 |
| 2 | 3 | 267 | -54 | 3 | 220 | +30 |
| 3 | 4 | 329 | -18 | 3 | 150 | +13 |
| 4 | 5 | 528 | -30 | 3 | 74 | -15 |
| 5 | 3 | 186 | -4 | 3 | 107 | -23 |
| 6 | 4 | 440 | -47 | 3 | 134 | +3 |
| 7 | 4 | 366 | +47 | 3 | 104 | -41 |
| 8 | 5 | 559 | -50 | 3 | 165 | +13 |
| 9 | 4 | 433 | +44 | 3 | 143 | +8 |
| 10 | 3 | 182 | -44 | 3 | 173 | -61 |
| 11 | 4 | 427 | -7 | 3 | 188 | -1 |
| 12 | 4 | 336 | -24 | 3 | 163 | -3 |
| 13 | 5 | 645 | +93 | 3 | 89 | +21 |
| 14 | 4 | 422 | +12 | – | – | – |
| 15 | 4 | 453 | +99 | – | – | – |
| 16 | 3 | 224 | -59 | – | – | – |
| 17 | 4 | 486 | -28 | – | – | – |
| 18 | 5 | 550 | +61 | – | – | – |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.