Phillip J. Rotella Memorial Golf Course vs Rockland Lake Championship Golf Course
6.4 mi apart · numbers from each course's map geometry
Phillip J. Rotella Memorial Golf Course
near Pomona, New York
Rockland Lake Championship Golf Course
near Croton-on-Hudson, New York
| Measure | Phillip J. Rotella Memorial Golf Course | Rockland Lake Championship Golf Course |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 18 |
| Par | 72 | 71 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 5 · 8 · 5 | 5 · 9 · 4 |
| Measured length | 6,180 yd | 6,757 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 11, 545 yd | No. 14, 542 yd |
| Bunkers | 53 | 36 |
| Sand | 1.4 acres | 1 acres |
| Holes with water | 3 | 2 |
| Water on the property | 2.5 acres | 0.1 acres |
| Total climb | 437 ft | 398 ft |
| Elevation | 290–485 ft | 150–317 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -117 ft | -70 ft |
| Average green | 5,077 sq ft | 3,841 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 32 yd | 33 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,284 yd | 1,186 yd |
| Property | 147 acres | 143 acres |
| Cart path | 4.5 mi | 4.4 mi |
| Driving range | not mapped | not mapped |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Phillip J. Rotella Memorial Golf Course | Rockland Lake Championship Golf Course | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 4 | 341 | -92 | 4 | 373 | -61 |
| 2 | 4 | 381 | +47 | 4 | 431 | -37 |
| 3 | 3 | 153 | +3 | 5 | 488 | -37 |
| 4 | 4 | 455 | +9 | 4 | 404 | +63 |
| 5 | 3 | 223 | -117 | 3 | 387 | -68 |
| 6 | 5 | 472 | +100 | 3 | 205 | +24 |
| 7 | 4 | 287 | -1 | 5 | 538 | +1 |
| 8 | 3 | 183 | -32 | 4 | 408 | +15 |
| 9 | 5 | 433 | +78 | 3 | 187 | +5 |
| 10 | 4 | 331 | +33 | 4 | 347 | -51 |
| 11 | 5 | 545 | -61 | 5 | 476 | +55 |
| 12 | 3 | 194 | -24 | 3 | 214 | -70 |
| 13 | 5 | 501 | -3 | 4 | 422 | +51 |
| 14 | 4 | 349 | +24 | 5 | 542 | -60 |
| 15 | 4 | 331 | +4 | 4 | 422 | -40 |
| 16 | 5 | 536 | +3 | 3 | 169 | -14 |
| 17 | 3 | 138 | +2 | 4 | 386 | +22 |
| 18 | 4 | 327 | +74 | 4 | 358 | -3 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.