Red Hawk Golf and Resort, course 1 of 2 vs Red Hawk Golf and Resort, course 2 of 2
Next to each other · numbers from each course's map geometry
Red Hawk Golf and Resort, course 1 of 2
Sparks, Nevada
Red Hawk Golf and Resort, course 2 of 2
Sparks, Nevada
| Measure | Red Hawk Golf and Resort, course 1 of 2 | Red Hawk Golf and Resort, course 2 of 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 18 |
| Par | 71 | 72 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 4 · 11 · 3 | 4 · 10 · 4 |
| Measured length | 7,076 yd | 6,956 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 10, 688 yd | No. 2, 569 yd |
| Bunkers | 93 | 106 |
| Sand | 1.9 acres | 4.8 acres |
| Holes with water | 9 | 10 |
| Water on the property | 38.8 acres | 38.8 acres |
| Total climb | 335 ft | 68 ft |
| Elevation | 4,473–4,743 ft | 4,473–4,743 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -122 ft | -19 ft |
| Average green | 4,780 sq ft | 5,892 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 42 yd | 52 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 2,234 yd | 1,918 yd |
| Property | 496 acres | 496 acres |
| Cart path | 12.3 mi | 12.3 mi |
| Driving range | not mapped | not mapped |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Red Hawk Golf and Resort, course 1 of 2 | Red Hawk Golf and Resort, course 2 of 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 5 | 608 | +23 | 4 | 394 | +1 |
| 2 | 4 | 408 | +47 | 5 | 569 | +16 |
| 3 | 4 | 372 | -49 | 4 | 401 | -19 |
| 4 | 4 | 409 | -13 | 3 | 217 | +5 |
| 5 | 3 | 152 | -9 | 4 | 420 | +13 |
| 6 | 4 | 488 | +50 | 5 | 537 | -5 |
| 7 | 3 | 157 | -22 | 4 | 395 | -2 |
| 8 | 5 | 524 | +87 | 3 | 220 | 0 |
| 9 | 4 | 315 | +25 | 4 | 429 | -1 |
| 10 | 5 | 688 | -122 | 5 | 524 | 0 |
| 11 | 3 | 239 | -56 | 4 | 410 | +4 |
| 12 | 4 | 447 | -57 | 3 | 167 | +1 |
| 13 | 3 | 151 | +2 | 4 | 346 | +2 |
| 14 | 4 | 400 | +50 | 4 | 365 | 0 |
| 15 | 4 | 393 | +51 | 4 | 428 | +5 |
| 16 | 4 | 480 | -100 | 5 | 526 | -6 |
| 17 | 4 | 437 | -44 | 3 | 177 | -4 |
| 18 | 4 | 408 | -26 | 4 | 431 | +1 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.