Red Hill Country Club vs Upland Hills Country Club
Next to each other · numbers from each course's map geometry
Red Hill Country Club
Rancho Cucamonga, California
Upland Hills Country Club
Upland, California
| Measure | Red Hill Country Club | Upland Hills Country Club |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 18 |
| Par | 72 | 70 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 4 · 10 · 4 | 6 · 8 · 4 |
| Measured length | 6,470 yd | 5,254 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 5, 565 yd | No. 6, 539 yd |
| Bunkers | 57 | 40 |
| Sand | 22.5 acres | 1.1 acres |
| Holes with water | 5 | 6 |
| Water on the property | 1 acres | 2.2 acres |
| Total climb | 301 ft | 108 ft |
| Elevation | 1,296–1,456 ft | 1,431–1,525 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -55 ft | -16 ft |
| Average green | 4,322 sq ft | 4,695 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 36 yd | 32 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,180 yd | 2,184 yd |
| Property | 138 acres | 105 acres |
| Cart path | 3.8 mi | 2.3 mi |
| Driving range | not mapped | not mapped |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Red Hill Country Club | Upland Hills Country Club | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 4 | 257 | -54 | 4 | 342 | -16 |
| 2 | 4 | 399 | +22 | 3 | 124 | -9 |
| 3 | 4 | 428 | +31 | 4 | 321 | +32 |
| 4 | 3 | 132 | -5 | 5 | 430 | +6 |
| 5 | 5 | 565 | +58 | 4 | 323 | -15 |
| 6 | 3 | 223 | -6 | 5 | 539 | -13 |
| 7 | 5 | 500 | -55 | 3 | 153 | -14 |
| 8 | 4 | 318 | -27 | 4 | 351 | +13 |
| 9 | 4 | 359 | +28 | 3 | 148 | +3 |
| 10 | 3 | 141 | -55 | 3 | 100 | -9 |
| 11 | 4 | 360 | +29 | 4 | 349 | -4 |
| 12 | 5 | 504 | +41 | 4 | 301 | +4 |
| 13 | 4 | 421 | -35 | 5 | 471 | -1 |
| 14 | 5 | 508 | +43 | 4 | 333 | +5 |
| 15 | 3 | 186 | +13 | 3 | 169 | +8 |
| 16 | 4 | 453 | -39 | 5 | 401 | +2 |
| 17 | 4 | 312 | -30 | 3 | 125 | +9 |
| 18 | 4 | 404 | 0 | 4 | 274 | +7 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.