The Glacier Golf Course & The Prairie Glen Golf Course vs Trappers Turn Golf Club
17 mi apart · numbers from each course's map geometry
The Glacier Golf Course & The Prairie Glen Golf Course
near Baraboo, Wisconsin
Trappers Turn Golf Club
Wisconsin Dells, Wisconsin
| Measure | The Glacier Golf Course & The Prairie Glen Golf Course | Trappers Turn Golf Club |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 18 |
| Par | 72 | 72 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 4 · 10 · 4 | 4 · 10 · 4 |
| Measured length | 6,348 yd | 6,692 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 1, 511 yd | No. 12, 566 yd |
| Bunkers | 81 | 81 |
| Sand | 2.1 acres | 1.8 acres |
| Holes with water | 8 | 10 |
| Water on the property | 11.7 acres | 16.5 acres |
| Total climb | 240 ft | 282 ft |
| Elevation | 876–1,271 ft | 836–923 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -108 ft | -46 ft |
| Average green | 5,497 sq ft | 5,390 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 36 yd | 33 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,770 yd | 1,766 yd |
| Property | 349 acres | 374 acres |
| Cart path | 0.3 mi | 7.2 mi |
| Driving range | not mapped | not mapped |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | The Glacier Golf Course & The Prairie Glen Golf Course | Trappers Turn Golf Club | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 5 | 511 | -3 | 4 | 338 | +21 |
| 2 | 4 | 365 | +26 | 5 | 498 | +5 |
| 3 | 3 | 140 | +5 | 3 | 159 | +15 |
| 4 | 5 | 462 | -49 | 4 | 426 | +4 |
| 5 | 5 | 487 | +8 | 4 | 333 | +3 |
| 6 | 4 | 346 | +67 | 4 | 435 | -46 |
| 7 | 3 | 179 | -82 | 3 | 186 | -8 |
| 8 | 4 | 365 | -108 | 5 | 447 | +21 |
| 9 | 4 | 338 | -19 | 4 | 412 | -37 |
| 10 | 5 | 510 | -4 | 4 | 429 | -2 |
| 11 | 4 | 386 | +1 | 4 | 373 | +15 |
| 12 | 3 | 190 | +3 | 5 | 566 | -15 |
| 13 | 4 | 430 | +20 | 3 | 212 | -44 |
| 14 | 4 | 387 | -24 | 4 | 347 | +31 |
| 15 | 4 | 366 | -4 | 3 | 191 | -24 |
| 16 | 3 | 142 | +3 | 4 | 378 | +27 |
| 17 | 4 | 374 | -26 | 4 | 447 | 0 |
| 18 | 4 | 370 | +9 | 5 | 515 | -2 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.