Twin Orchards Country Club, course 1 of 2 vs Twin Orchards Country Club, course 2 of 2
Next to each other · numbers from each course's map geometry
Twin Orchards Country Club, course 1 of 2
near Long Grove, Illinois
Twin Orchards Country Club, course 2 of 2
near Long Grove, Illinois
| Measure | Twin Orchards Country Club, course 1 of 2 | Twin Orchards Country Club, course 2 of 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Holes | 18 | 18 |
| Par | 72 | 70 |
| Par 3 · 4 · 5 | 4 · 10 · 4 | 5 · 10 · 3 |
| Measured length | 6,833 yd | 6,387 yd |
| Longest hole | No. 1, 593 yd | No. 3, 511 yd |
| Bunkers | 86 | 77 |
| Sand | 1.3 acres | 1.2 acres |
| Holes with water | 13 | 12 |
| Water on the property | 10.4 acres | 10.4 acres |
| Total climb | 280 ft | 195 ft |
| Elevation | 695–752 ft | 695–752 ft |
| Biggest drop to a green | -35 ft | -25 ft |
| Average green | 4,512 sq ft | 5,473 sq ft |
| Average fairway width | 29 yd | 30 yd |
| Green to next tee, total | 1,320 yd | 1,648 yd |
| Property | 243 acres | 243 acres |
| Cart path | 5.2 mi | 5.2 mi |
| Driving range | yes | yes |
Hole by hole
Par and measured yards for each hole; rise is tee to green.
| Hole | Twin Orchards Country Club, course 1 of 2 | Twin Orchards Country Club, course 2 of 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Par | Yd | Rise | Par | Yd | Rise | |
| 1 | 5 | 593 | -12 | 4 | 420 | -24 |
| 2 | 4 | 417 | -12 | 3 | 192 | +14 |
| 3 | 4 | 368 | +2 | 5 | 511 | +2 |
| 4 | 3 | 190 | 0 | 4 | 439 | -25 |
| 5 | 5 | 493 | +16 | 3 | 158 | +18 |
| 6 | 3 | 151 | -18 | 4 | 353 | -9 |
| 7 | 4 | 468 | +11 | 5 | 508 | +2 |
| 8 | 5 | 558 | -14 | 3 | 205 | +2 |
| 9 | 4 | 420 | +2 | 4 | 430 | -25 |
| 10 | 4 | 427 | -9 | 4 | 363 | 0 |
| 11 | 5 | 473 | +20 | 3 | 174 | +11 |
| 12 | 4 | 377 | -35 | 5 | 503 | -1 |
| 13 | 4 | 388 | -1 | 3 | 173 | +3 |
| 14 | 3 | 186 | +34 | 4 | 312 | -19 |
| 15 | 4 | 341 | -29 | 4 | 410 | +6 |
| 16 | 4 | 383 | +13 | 4 | 428 | +5 |
| 17 | 3 | 158 | +8 | 4 | 365 | -17 |
| 18 | 4 | 442 | -18 | 4 | 443 | -16 |
Both courses are drawn by OpenStreetMap contributors; a difference in detail (bunker counts especially) can be a difference in how carefully each was mapped. How each number is measured.